Do Director Elections Matter?
Boston College - Department of Finance
University of British Columbia (UBC) - Sauder School of Business; China Academy of Financial Research (CAFR)
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
July 2, 2015
Abstract:
Using a hand-collected sample of more than 30,000 directors nominated for election over the period 2001–2010, we construct a novel measure of director proximity to elections — Distance-from-election. We find that the closer a director is to her next election, the higher is CEO turnover–performance sensitivity. Each year closer to director elections is associated with a 23% increase in CEO turnover–performance sensitivity. Three tests support a causal interpretation. Cross-sectional tests further show that, when other governance mechanisms are in place, CEO turnover–performance sensitivity is less affected by Distance-from-election. We conclude that director elections have important governance implications.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52
Keywords: agency problems, CEO turnover-performance sensitivity, corporate governance, director elections, staggered boards
JEL Classification: G34, G38